Review



human colorectal cancer cell lines colo205  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    ATCC human colorectal cancer cell lines colo205
    1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of <t>COLO205,</t> SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .
    Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines Colo205, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1811 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+colorectal+cancer+cell+lines+colo205/pmc12886026-169-0-9?v=ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1811 article reviews
    human colorectal cancer cell lines colo205 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Inhibition of colorectal cancer progression through conformation-specific targeting of ADAM10 metalloprotease"

    Article Title: Inhibition of colorectal cancer progression through conformation-specific targeting of ADAM10 metalloprotease

    Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1704436

    1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of COLO205, SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .
    Figure Legend Snippet: 1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of COLO205, SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .

    Techniques Used: Control, Concentration Assay, Comparison, Staining

    1H5 specifically targets ADAM10. (A) Proliferation curves of shRenilla and shADAM10 knockdown cells (COLO205, SW620, and DLD-1) measured by live-cell imaging over 96 h following doxycycline induction. Cells were seeded in the presence of 1 µg/mL doxycycline to induce shRNA expression. Phase area was normalized to baseline (0 h). (B) Relative proliferation of doxycycline-induced shRenilla and shADAM10 cells following treatment with 40 µg/mL 1H5. 1H5 was added 24 h after seeding, and proliferation was monitored by live-cell imaging over time. Data represent three biological replicates and are shown as mean ± SD. ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 by two-way ANOVA.
    Figure Legend Snippet: 1H5 specifically targets ADAM10. (A) Proliferation curves of shRenilla and shADAM10 knockdown cells (COLO205, SW620, and DLD-1) measured by live-cell imaging over 96 h following doxycycline induction. Cells were seeded in the presence of 1 µg/mL doxycycline to induce shRNA expression. Phase area was normalized to baseline (0 h). (B) Relative proliferation of doxycycline-induced shRenilla and shADAM10 cells following treatment with 40 µg/mL 1H5. 1H5 was added 24 h after seeding, and proliferation was monitored by live-cell imaging over time. Data represent three biological replicates and are shown as mean ± SD. ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 by two-way ANOVA.

    Techniques Used: Knockdown, Live Cell Imaging, shRNA, Expressing

    1H5 inhibits Notch signaling in CRC cell lines. (A) Basal protein expression of NICD, NOTCH1, phosphorylated EGFR (p-EGFR), and total EGFR in DLD-1, SW620, and COLO205 cells. GAPDH served as a loading control. Western blots were performed using two biological replicates. (B) Western blot analysis of NICD and NOTCH1 in COLO205 cells treated with 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL), γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI; 20 or 100 µM), IgG control (100 µg/mL), or DMSO (100 µM) for 48 (h) GAPDH was used as a loading control. Two biological replicates were performed. (C) HES1 mRNA expression in COLO205 cells treated with IgG control (20 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL) for 48 h Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test; p < 0.05. (D) Western blot analysis of NICD and NOTCH1 in SW620 cells treated with 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL), GSI (20 µM), IgG control (20 µg/mL), or DMSO (100 µM) for 48 (h) GAPDH was used as a loading control. Two biological replicates were performed. (E) HES1 mRNA expression in SW620 cells treated with IgG control (20 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL) for 48 (h) Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test; *p < 0.05 .
    Figure Legend Snippet: 1H5 inhibits Notch signaling in CRC cell lines. (A) Basal protein expression of NICD, NOTCH1, phosphorylated EGFR (p-EGFR), and total EGFR in DLD-1, SW620, and COLO205 cells. GAPDH served as a loading control. Western blots were performed using two biological replicates. (B) Western blot analysis of NICD and NOTCH1 in COLO205 cells treated with 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL), γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI; 20 or 100 µM), IgG control (100 µg/mL), or DMSO (100 µM) for 48 (h) GAPDH was used as a loading control. Two biological replicates were performed. (C) HES1 mRNA expression in COLO205 cells treated with IgG control (20 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL) for 48 h Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test; p < 0.05. (D) Western blot analysis of NICD and NOTCH1 in SW620 cells treated with 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL), GSI (20 µM), IgG control (20 µg/mL), or DMSO (100 µM) for 48 (h) GAPDH was used as a loading control. Two biological replicates were performed. (E) HES1 mRNA expression in SW620 cells treated with IgG control (20 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL) for 48 (h) Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test; *p < 0.05 .

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Western Blot, Comparison



    Similar Products

    96
    ATCC human colorectal cancer cell lines colo205
    1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of <t>COLO205,</t> SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .
    Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines Colo205, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+colorectal+cancer+cell+lines+colo205/pmc12886026-169-0-9?v=ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human colorectal cancer cell lines colo205 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC reporter assays human colorectal cancer cell lines colo205
    1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of <t>COLO205,</t> SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .
    Reporter Assays Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines Colo205, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+colorectal+cancer+cell+lines+colo205/pmc12281475__cb5c00338_si_001-15-3-18?v=ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    reporter assays human colorectal cancer cell lines colo205 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC human colorectal cancer cell line colo205
    1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of <t>COLO205,</t> SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .
    Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Line Colo205, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+colorectal+cancer+cell+lines+colo205/pmc07563660-130-0-11?v=ATCC
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human colorectal cancer cell line colo205 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    National Centre for Cell Science human colorectal cancer cell line colo205
    1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of <t>COLO205,</t> SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .
    Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Line Colo205, supplied by National Centre for Cell Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+colorectal+cancer+cell+lines+colo205/10__22159_slash_ijpps__2017v9i11__21120-41-9-13?v=National+Centre+for+Cell+Science
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human colorectal cancer cell line colo205 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of COLO205, SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .

    Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

    Article Title: Inhibition of colorectal cancer progression through conformation-specific targeting of ADAM10 metalloprotease

    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1704436

    Figure Lengend Snippet: 1H5 reduces viability, proliferation, and colony formation in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (A) Cell viability of COLO205, SW620, and DLD-1 cells measured by Alamar Blue after 48 h and 72 h of treatment with IgG control (40 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL). Viability values were normalized to the IgG control for visualization. For statistical testing across cell lines, normalized values were converted to Δ-viability (treatment – 100), and each time point (48 h and 72 h) was analyzed separately using two-way ANOVA (cell line × concentration) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (B) Real-time proliferation measured by IncuCyte. Phase-area confluence was tracked every 4 h and normalized to baseline. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. (C) Representative images of crystal violet–stained colonies after 10 days of treatment. (D) Quantification of colony numbers from panel (C) . Group differences were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with multiple-comparison correction. Data represent mean ± SD from biological replicates. Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 .

    Article Snippet: Human colorectal cancer cell lines COLO205, DLD-1, and SW620 (ATCC, USA) were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S).

    Techniques: Control, Concentration Assay, Comparison, Staining

    1H5 specifically targets ADAM10. (A) Proliferation curves of shRenilla and shADAM10 knockdown cells (COLO205, SW620, and DLD-1) measured by live-cell imaging over 96 h following doxycycline induction. Cells were seeded in the presence of 1 µg/mL doxycycline to induce shRNA expression. Phase area was normalized to baseline (0 h). (B) Relative proliferation of doxycycline-induced shRenilla and shADAM10 cells following treatment with 40 µg/mL 1H5. 1H5 was added 24 h after seeding, and proliferation was monitored by live-cell imaging over time. Data represent three biological replicates and are shown as mean ± SD. ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 by two-way ANOVA.

    Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

    Article Title: Inhibition of colorectal cancer progression through conformation-specific targeting of ADAM10 metalloprotease

    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1704436

    Figure Lengend Snippet: 1H5 specifically targets ADAM10. (A) Proliferation curves of shRenilla and shADAM10 knockdown cells (COLO205, SW620, and DLD-1) measured by live-cell imaging over 96 h following doxycycline induction. Cells were seeded in the presence of 1 µg/mL doxycycline to induce shRNA expression. Phase area was normalized to baseline (0 h). (B) Relative proliferation of doxycycline-induced shRenilla and shADAM10 cells following treatment with 40 µg/mL 1H5. 1H5 was added 24 h after seeding, and proliferation was monitored by live-cell imaging over time. Data represent three biological replicates and are shown as mean ± SD. ****p < 0.0001, ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 by two-way ANOVA.

    Article Snippet: Human colorectal cancer cell lines COLO205, DLD-1, and SW620 (ATCC, USA) were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S).

    Techniques: Knockdown, Live Cell Imaging, shRNA, Expressing

    1H5 inhibits Notch signaling in CRC cell lines. (A) Basal protein expression of NICD, NOTCH1, phosphorylated EGFR (p-EGFR), and total EGFR in DLD-1, SW620, and COLO205 cells. GAPDH served as a loading control. Western blots were performed using two biological replicates. (B) Western blot analysis of NICD and NOTCH1 in COLO205 cells treated with 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL), γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI; 20 or 100 µM), IgG control (100 µg/mL), or DMSO (100 µM) for 48 (h) GAPDH was used as a loading control. Two biological replicates were performed. (C) HES1 mRNA expression in COLO205 cells treated with IgG control (20 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL) for 48 h Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test; p < 0.05. (D) Western blot analysis of NICD and NOTCH1 in SW620 cells treated with 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL), GSI (20 µM), IgG control (20 µg/mL), or DMSO (100 µM) for 48 (h) GAPDH was used as a loading control. Two biological replicates were performed. (E) HES1 mRNA expression in SW620 cells treated with IgG control (20 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL) for 48 (h) Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test; *p < 0.05 .

    Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

    Article Title: Inhibition of colorectal cancer progression through conformation-specific targeting of ADAM10 metalloprotease

    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1704436

    Figure Lengend Snippet: 1H5 inhibits Notch signaling in CRC cell lines. (A) Basal protein expression of NICD, NOTCH1, phosphorylated EGFR (p-EGFR), and total EGFR in DLD-1, SW620, and COLO205 cells. GAPDH served as a loading control. Western blots were performed using two biological replicates. (B) Western blot analysis of NICD and NOTCH1 in COLO205 cells treated with 1H5 (5–40 µg/mL), γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI; 20 or 100 µM), IgG control (100 µg/mL), or DMSO (100 µM) for 48 (h) GAPDH was used as a loading control. Two biological replicates were performed. (C) HES1 mRNA expression in COLO205 cells treated with IgG control (20 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL) for 48 h Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison test; p < 0.05. (D) Western blot analysis of NICD and NOTCH1 in SW620 cells treated with 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL), GSI (20 µM), IgG control (20 µg/mL), or DMSO (100 µM) for 48 (h) GAPDH was used as a loading control. Two biological replicates were performed. (E) HES1 mRNA expression in SW620 cells treated with IgG control (20 µg/mL) or 1H5 (5 or 20 µg/mL) for 48 (h) Data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test; *p < 0.05 .

    Article Snippet: Human colorectal cancer cell lines COLO205, DLD-1, and SW620 (ATCC, USA) were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S).

    Techniques: Expressing, Control, Western Blot, Comparison